Southern U.S. Representatives Leading the Campaign Against Illegal Immigration

Nearly half of Southern U.S. House incumbents address illegal immigration on campaign websites, compared to 30 percent from the West, 23 percent in the Midwest, and 14 percent out East

This is the second in a series of reports on U.S. House incumbents campaigning on illegal immigration. The first report analyzed the differences in how Democratic and Republican incumbents highlighted illegal immigration on their campaign websites.

Although support for a crackdown on illegal immigration – as well as the Arizona law SB 1070 – is enjoying large support in states across the country, it is not drawing uniform attention from Representatives in the U.S. House.

A Smart Politics content analysis of campaign websites for U.S. House incumbents running for reelection in 2010 finds that 49 percent of Representatives from Southern states are highlighting the immigration issue, compared to just 30 percent from Western states, 23 percent from the Midwest, and 14 percent from the East.

Smart Politics content analyzed the policy issues highlighted on the campaign websites of 373 members of the U.S. House (all 435 seats minus vacancies, minus the more than three dozen Representatives not running for reelection, minus those incumbents already defeated in primaries, minus 18 Representatives who do not maintain campaign websites).

Of the 124 Representatives running for reelection to the House from the 16 Southern states, 61 are putting immigration issues in the spotlight on their websites (49.2 percent) while 63 are not (50.8 percent).

Southern members of Congress are by far the most immigration-focused of the four regions of the United States, in part because delegation-heavy Texas is a border state with Mexico. Twenty of the Lone Star State’s 29 Representatives with campaign websites highlight immigration as a top issue, with 17 of them advocating get-tough reforms, such as Republican Michael Burgess (TX-26):

“Over the past decade, immigration has become a crisis for our nation. With over one million immigrants streaming into our country every year, our education, terrorism, healthcare, and prison systems are being heavily burdened by this growing population.”

Meanwhile, just 30.3 percent of Representatives from the nation’s 13 Western states feature immigration as one of the top issues on their campaign websites (27 of 89), including of five of the seven incumbents running for reelection from Arizona and five of seven from Colorado.

However, none of the three (all Democratic) incumbents from the border state of New Mexico are putting immigration in the spotlight, nor are 32 of the 46 incumbents with campaign websites from California. Several of those who are focused on immigration from California are opposed to the enforcement-first policy backed by the GOP and the majority of Americans (e.g. Linda Sanchez, CA-39; Joe Baca, CA-43; Bob Filner, CA-51).

Representing districts further away from the U.S.-Mexican border are those from the nation’s 12 Midwestern states.

Of the 88 incumbents running for reelection maintaining a campaign website, just 20 are emphasizing the immigration issue (22.7 percent).

Of the four northern rim states in this region – North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan – just 3 of 27 incumbents address illegal immigration on their websites (11.1 percent): Paul Ryan (WI-01; advocating a get-tough approach), Keith Ellison (MN-05, soft), and Thad McCotter (MI-11; get-tough).

Moving still further from the southern border are Representatives from the nine states in the Eastern region of the country. Only 13.9 percent of incumbents from these states (10 of 72) are highlighting immigration on their campaign websites.

Geographic Distribution of U.S. House Incumbents Highlighting Immigration on Campaign Websites

Region	Yes	No	Total	% Yes	% No
South	61	63	124	49.2	50.8
West	27	62	89	30.3	69.7
Midwest	20	68	88	22.7	77.3
East	10	62	72	13.9	86.1
Total	118	255	373	31.6	68.4

Data based on the percentage of all U.S. House incumbents running for reelection with campaign websites by regions as demarcated by the U.S. Census. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Of course, part of the reason why Southern members of the U.S. House are inordinately highlighting immigration on their campaign websites is that this region is dominated by Republicans.

The first part of this series of reports demonstrated GOP incumbents to be focusing on immigration 2.7 times more than their Democratic counterparts.

In total, 69.1 percent of Southern Republican incumbents featured immigration as a top issue on their websites, compared to 44.1 percent out West, 32.5 percent in the Midwest, and 21.4 percent out East.

The GOP has 68 incumbents running in the South (plus one without a website), compared to 40 in the Midwest, 34 in the West, and 14 in the East.

The geographic distribution of Democratic U.S. House members running for reelection is much more even: 58 in the East (plus six without websites), 56 in the South (plus four without websites), 55 in the West (plus four without websites), and 48 in the Midwest (plus three without websites).

Overall, 25 percent of Democratic Representatives from the South highlight immigration, compared to 21.8 percent out West, 14.6 percent in the Midwest, and 12.1 percent out East.

U.S. House Incumbents Addressing Immigration on Campaign Websites by Region and Party

Republican	Yes	No	Total	% Yes	% No
South	47	21	68	69.1	30.9
West	15	19	34	44.1	55.9
Midwest	13	27	40	32.5	67.5
East	3	11	14	21.4	78.6
Total	78	78	156	50.0	50.0
Democrat	Yes	No	Total	% Yes	% No
South	14	42	56	25.0	75.0
West	12	43	55	21.8	78.2
Midwest	7	41	48	14.6	85.4
East	7	51	58	12.1	87.9
Total	40	177	217	18.4	81.6

Data based on the percentage of all U.S. House incumbents running for reelection with campaign websites by party and region, as demarcated by the U.S. Census. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.