‘Get It Done’: Slogans Drop Obama’s SOTU Address to 9th Grade Reading Level
All four of the president’s State of the Union addresses rank in the Bottom 10 in presidential history for Flesch-Kincaid grade level readability scores
While delivering remarks on climate change during his State of the Union address Tuesday evening, Barack Obama stated, “No single event makes a trend.”
However, after four State of the Union Addresses, there has definitely been a trend in these high profile speeches written by the president and his team.
For while the emphasis on which policies are highlighted may change a bit from year to year, the linguistic backbone of the president’s addresses has remained the same: short sentences with short words.
And a fair amount of slogans.
A Smart Politics review of the 92 orally delivered State of the Union Addresses since George Washington finds that each of President Obama’s addresses rank in the Bottom 10 on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test, with his 2013 address written at a 9th grade level.
The Flesch-Kincaid test is designed to assess the readability level of written text, with a formula that translates the score to a U.S. grade level. Longer sentences and sentences utilizing words with more syllables produce higher scores. Shorter sentences and sentences incorporating more monosyllabic words yield lower scores.
From Thomas Jefferson through William Taft, every State of the Union message was delivered in written form to Congress.
President Wilson then delivered six oral addresses during his two terms to the nation’s lawmakers with Warren Harding delivering two in this manner and Calvin Coolidge one. Herbert Hoover presented all of his annual messages in written form.
It was not until Franklin Roosevelt that the oral form of communication became the standard, although there have been five written addresses since FDR (by Truman in 1946 and 1953, Eisenhower in 1961, Nixon in 1973, and Carter in 1981) as well as two addresses that were delivered orally, but not by the President himself (Roosevelt in 1945 and Eisenhower in 1956).
Obama’s 2013 address continues the pattern that has emerged from his previous three addresses.
The president’s speech was written at a 9.2 grade level on the Flesch-Kincaid test (tied for the 10th lowest score all time) – slightly higher than his first three delivered in 2010 (8.8, 6th lowest), 2011 (8.1, 2nd lowest), and 2012 (8.4, 3rd lowest).
Each of Obama’s SOTUs also rank in the Bottom 10 in terms of the number of words used per sentence, with his 2013 speech coming in at 17.5, or four fewer words per sentence than the average orally delivered SOTU address since the 1900s.
Obama’s 2012 and 2010 addresses averaged 16.6 words per sentence with his 2011 address averaging 16.8.
And what does a 17-word sentence look like?
It just so happens one Obama’s most memorable lines came in at that length:
“Our government shouldn’t make promises we cannot keep – but we must keep the promises we’ve already made.”
Obama’s speeches also continue the general trend that finds as State of the Union Addresses have perhaps become more and more political – with a greater eye on the television audience than the members of Congress in the room – they have been written with more simple language.
With four addresses under his belt, President Obama is now tied with George H.W. Bush for the lowest average Flesch-Kincaid score for State of the Union addresses of any president with an 8.6 grade level.
The addresses by Obama and the elder Bush are more than two grades lower than the 11.2 average score of all 80 oral addresses delivered by presidents of the 20th and 21st Centuries.
(The oral messages to Congress delivered by George Washington and John Adams from 1790 to 1800 came in at Flesch-Kincaid readability scores of 17.6 and 18.0 respectively and are not included in the above data).
The highest scoring presidents on the Flesch-Kincaid readability scale for orally delivered State of the Union messages since the 20th Century are Warren Harding at 14.4, Woodrow Wilson at 13.9, and John Kennedy at 13.2.
Average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level by President for Orally Delivered State of the Union Addresses Since Woodrow Wilson
Rank
|
President
|
# Oral Addresses
|
Words per sentence
|
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
|
1
|
Warren Harding
|
2
|
25.3
|
14.4
|
2
|
Woodrow Wilson
|
6
|
28.5
|
13.9
|
3
|
John Kennedy
|
3
|
24.4
|
13.2
|
4
|
Dwight Eisenhower
|
7
|
20.9
|
12.8
|
5
|
Franklin Roosevelt
|
11
|
24.4
|
12.5
|
6
|
Richard Nixon
|
4
|
23.5
|
11.6
|
7
|
Calvin Coolidge
|
1
|
17.8
|
11.3
|
8
|
Gerald Ford
|
3
|
19.3
|
11.2
|
9
|
Jimmy Carter
|
3
|
19.7
|
10.8
|
10
|
Harry Truman
|
6
|
19.0
|
10.6
|
11
|
Lyndon Johnson
|
6
|
20.3
|
10.4
|
11
|
George W. Bush
|
7
|
19.0
|
10.4
|
13
|
Ronald Reagan
|
7
|
19.6
|
10.3
|
14
|
Bill Clinton
|
7
|
19.0
|
9.5
|
15
|
George H.W. Bush
|
3
|
17.4
|
8.6
|
15
|
Barack Obama
|
4
|
16.9
|
8.6
|
Data compiled by Smart Politics.
Part of what drags down the Flesch-Kincaid scores in speeches like Obama’s Tuesday night, is the repetition of slogans throughout the address.
Such slogans are usually constructed in sentences that are a few words long – with mostly monosyllabic words – and are frequently peppered into the speech to deliver a thematic punch and perhaps the hope of creating a memorable moment.
During his speech Tuesday evening, Obama’s most repeated slogan involved “getting things done” on a variety of policy issues:
“We can get this done.” (Two times, on tax reform and his Partnership to Rebuild America).
“Now is the time to get it done.” (Two times on comprehensive immigration reform).
“Let’s get it done.” (Two times, on immigration)
“We can get that done.” (On creating manufacturing hubs).
“In other words, we know what needs to be done.” (On immigration).
“So let’s get this done.” (On immigration)
“We should be able to get that done.” (On raising the federal minimum wage).
“This is something we should be able to get done on a bipartisan basis.” (On fighting cyber threats).
Sometimes a slogan is repeated several times within the context of a singular issue for even greater dramatic effect.
On the issue of gun control policies advocated by Obama on Tuesday evening, the president hammered home the slogan, “They deserve a vote.”
Obama delivered a variation on that phrase 10 times during the gun control portion of his speech:
“Each of these proposals deserves a vote in Congress.”
“But these proposals deserve a vote.”
“They deserve a vote.” (Three times)
“Gabby Giffords deserves a vote.”
“The families of Newtown deserve a vote.”
“The families of Aurora deserve a vote.”
“They deserve a simple vote.” (Two times)
But does the use of such slogans with short sentences and short words mean the president delivered an ineffective speech?
Not necessarily.
Interspersing several short sentences can have a strategic, dramatic effect in a long speech.
The question, in a historical analysis such as this, is how Obama’s speeches differ from his predecessors (and why).
Interestingly, the president’s linguistic choices in his major addresses also stand in sharp contrast to the most famous address delivered by his wife.
The First Lady’s celebrated speech at the Democratic National Convention on September 4th of last year was written at a 12.8 grade level – more than 3.5 grade levels above the next highest speech of the 10 previous prepared remarks delivered by wives of presidential nominees and some 7+ grade levels ahead of Ann Romney who gave a speech written at just a 5.8 grade level at the Republican National Convention.
Meanwhile, the president’s address to the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte last September was written at just an 8.2 grade level – or 4.5 grade levels lower than the First Lady’s.
Not all of Obama’s major addresses since becoming president have ranked quite this low, however.
The president’s 2009 Inaugural address was written at a 9.3 grade level with his 2013 Inaugural coming in at 10.0.
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level for Orally Delivered State of the Union Addresses, 1913-2013
Presidential Address
|
Words per sentence
|
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
|
Wilson 1916
|
33.1
|
17.1
|
Roosevelt 1934
|
30.1
|
15.7
|
Wilson 1915
|
30.9
|
15.0
|
Harding 1921
|
25.8
|
14.6
|
Roosevelt 1937
|
26.3
|
14.5
|
Roosevelt 1938
|
27.5
|
14.3
|
Harding 1922
|
24.9
|
14.2
|
Wilson 1918
|
29.6
|
14.1
|
Wilson 1913
|
28.4
|
14.1
|
Eisenhower 1955
|
21.8
|
14.0
|
Roosevelt 1935
|
25.5
|
13.9
|
Kennedy 1961
|
25.4
|
13.9
|
Eisenhower 1960
|
22.7
|
13.4
|
Eisenhower 1957
|
21.9
|
13.4
|
Roosevelt 1940
|
26.6
|
13.4
|
Kennedy 1962
|
24.1
|
13.3
|
Eisenhower 1954
|
21.2
|
13.2
|
Eisenhower 1953
|
19.9
|
12.8
|
Truman 1947
|
20.8
|
12.7
|
Kennedy 1963
|
23.8
|
12.5
|
Nixon 1974
|
25.3
|
12.4
|
Wilson 1917
|
25.7
|
12.3
|
Ford 1977
|
21.8
|
11.9
|
Bush 2005
|
21.6
|
11.8
|
Roosevelt 1939
|
22.2
|
11.7
|
Eisenhower 1958
|
19.9
|
11.7
|
Truman 1950
|
21.9
|
11.6
|
Nixon 1971
|
23.3
|
11.6
|
Johnson 1964
|
24.1
|
11.6
|
Eisenhower 1959
|
18.9
|
11.4
|
Coolidge 1923
|
17.8
|
11.3
|
Reagan 1983
|
21.2
|
11.3
|
Roosevelt 1936
|
23.0
|
11.2
|
Carter 1980
|
20.7
|
11.2
|
Carter 1979
|
20.2
|
11.2
|
Roosevelt 1941
|
22.2
|
11.1
|
Nixon 1972
|
22.9
|
11.1
|
Nixon 1970
|
22.3
|
11.1
|
Roosevelt 1944
|
21.5
|
11.0
|
Wilson 1914
|
23.0
|
10.9
|
Reagan 1988
|
21.6
|
11.0
|
Ford 1975
|
18.3
|
11.0
|
Truman 1949
|
18.3
|
10.9
|
Roosevelt 1943
|
22.8
|
10.9
|
Reagan 1982
|
20.5
|
10.9
|
Johnson 1966
|
21.5
|
10.8
|
Bush 2006
|
19.2
|
10.8
|
Truman 1948
|
18.4
|
10.7
|
Johnson 1969
|
21.2
|
10.7
|
Ford 1976
|
17.9
|
10.7
|
Johnson 1967
|
19.9
|
10.4
|
Bush 2003
|
18.2
|
10.4
|
Johnson 1968
|
18.9
|
10.3
|
Bush 2008
|
18.4
|
10.2
|
Bush 2004
|
18.8
|
10.2
|
Clinton 1999
|
19.1
|
10.0
|
Carter 1978
|
18.2
|
9.9
|
Reagan 1987
|
18.6
|
9.8
|
Reagan 1986
|
19.8
|
9.8
|
Bush 2007
|
19.3
|
9.8
|
Reagan 1985
|
18.6
|
9.7
|
Clinton 1998
|
19.7
|
9.7
|
Roosevelt 1942
|
20.4
|
9.6
|
Clinton 1997
|
19.5
|
9.6
|
Reagan 1984
|
16.9
|
9.3
|
Clinton 2000
|
18.3
|
9.3
|
Clinton 1996
|
17.7
|
9.3
|
Clinton 1995
|
20.0
|
9.3
|
Bush 2002
|
17.8
|
9.3
|
Bush 1991
|
17.4
|
9.2
|
Obama 2013
|
17.5
|
9.2
|
Clinton 1994
|
18.6
|
9.0
|
Bush 1990
|
18.9
|
9.0
|
Truman 1952
|
18.1
|
8.9
|
Obama 2010
|
16.6
|
8.8
|
Truman 1951
|
16.3
|
8.6
|
Johnson 1965
|
16.1
|
8.6
|
Obama 2012
|
16.6
|
8.4
|
Obama 2011
|
16.8
|
8.1
|
Bush 1992
|
15.8
|
7.5
|
Average
|
21.2
|
11.2
|
Table compiled by Smart Politics.
Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.
Obama is a Constitutional lawyer. Bush has a degree from Harvard?, or is it Yale?
I think the level of speech writing says a lot more about the audiences than the Presidents.
Is this just an attempt to show us how our government is doing when it comes to education, or are you just trying to smear Obama…
To reach the majority of Americans, you message needs to be at a third grade level!