Women have yet to land a major party gubernatorial nomination in the Badger State, but that may all change with Mary Burke in 2014

maryburke10.jpgMonday’s announcement by former Trek bicycle executive and state Commerce Secretary Mary Burke that she would seek the Democratic nomination to challenge Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in 2014 puts the Badger State on a historic path.

To date, no woman has received the Democratic or Republican gubernatorial nomination in Wisconsin across 73 contests in state history – and it has even been 27 years since the last female minor party or independent candidate appeared on the ballot.

After failing to unseat Walker in the 2012 recall election, Wisconsin Democrats had been anxiously searching for a top-tier candidate to jump into the race, and Burke is expected to have the field essentially to herself en route to the general election.

The Badger State recently elected its first woman to the U.S. Senate when Tammy Baldwin defeated Tommy Thompson last November, and the state has been waiting decades for a Democratic or Republican woman to receive their party’s gubernatorial nomination.

The best showing of a female gubernatorial candidate in Wisconsin to date was the 0.7 percent received by Labor-Farm candidate Kathryn Christensen in the 1986 cycle won by Tommy Thompson.

Christensen placed third out of five candidates and received a shade over 10,000 votes.

Overall, just eight of the 302 gubernatorial candidates across 73 elections since statehood have been women (2.6 percent), with five of these candidacies launched by the same woman – frequent Socialist Labor nominee Georgia Cozzini.

Cozzini was the first woman to run for governor of the Badger State, winning 490 votes (0.1 percent) and placing last out of six candidates in 1942.

Cozzini followed that up with gubernatorial bids in 1944 (winning 0.1 percent), 1948 (0.0 percent), 1970 (0.1 percent), and 1974 (0.1 percent).

Georgia Cozzini was also the Vice-Presidential candidate of the Socialist Labor Party with Presidential nominee Eric Haas in 1956 (0.1 percent) and 1960 (0.1 percent) and ran for the U.S. Senate in Wisconsin on the Socialist Labor ticket in 1946 (0.2 percent), the special election of 1957 (0.1 percent), 1958 (0.0 percent), and 1962 (0.0 percent).

The only other women to appear on Wisconsin’s gubernatorial general election ballot are Progressive Labor Socialist Myrtle Kastner in 1970 (0.0 percent) and Socialist Workers candidate Adrienne Kaplan in 1978 (0.1 percent).

Wisconsin Female Gubernatorial Candidates, 1848-2012

Name
Year
Party
Place
%
Georgia Cozzini
1942
Socialist Labor
6 of 6
0.1
Georgia Cozzini
1944
Socialist Labor
5 of 5
0.1
Georgia Cozzini
1948
Socialist Labor
6 of 6
0.0
Georgia Cozzini
1970
Socialist Labor
4 of 6
0.1
Myrtle Kastner
1970
Progressive Labor Socialist
6 of 6
0.0
Georgia Cozzini
1974
Socialist Labor
7 of 7
0.1
Adrienne Kaplan
1978
Socialist Workers
5 of 6
0.1
Kathryn Christensen
1986
Labor-Farm
3 of 5
0.7

Table compiled by Smart Politics.

By comparison, neighboring Iowa has had five female gubernatorial candidates, including two major party nominees (Democrats Roxanne Conlin in 1982 and Bonnie Campbell in 1994).

Minnesota has had seven female minor party gubernatorial candidates but no major party nominees.

Overall, just three of the Midwest region’s 12 states have elected female governors over the decades:

· Nebraska: Republican Kay Orr, 1986
· Kansas: Democrat Joan Finney, 1990
· Kansas: Democrat Kathleen Sebelius, 2002 and 2006
· Michigan: Democrat Jennifer Granholm, 2002 and 2006

(Ohio Republican Lieutenant Governor Nancy Hollister also served as governor of the Buckeye State for 12 days after the resignation of George Voinovich to become a U.S. Senator).

Only 23 states have elected a woman into the governor’s office.

However, voters in the 2010 cycle from three states elected women to the governor’s office for the first time in history: Republicans Susana Martinez of New Mexico, Mary Fallin of Oklahoma, and Nikki Haley of South Carolina.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

4 Comments

  1. Anon on October 10, 2013 at 10:07 am

    Why do we care if a candidate is male or female, black or white? We need to elect someone who is smart and practical (those don’t necessarily go together), who understands state government (knowledge of local government would also be helpful), and who can think long term. If Mary Burke is that candidate, fine. I don’t know enough about her yet. But we should not select candidates based on gender, race, or other superficial characteristics.

  2. Frog Doctress on October 12, 2013 at 1:30 am

    Yes, let’s ignore the fact that, for all of written history, countless women have been denied positions of power simply because they are female. This woman will be judged on her appearance, dress, age and all sorts of other things that male candidates would never be judged for. To deny that this is hugely relevant is completely disingenuous and/or delusional.

  3. Kim on November 6, 2013 at 10:33 pm

    Please correct the spelling to Kathryn Christensen. My aunt would not be happy to see her last name spelled incorrectly.

  4. virago on November 21, 2013 at 9:03 am

    Frog Doctress, you said it. Denying that women are held up to a different standard is the sign of someone living in a fantasyland. It would be great if we could ignore gender and just elect the best person-male or female. However, it doesn’t work that way in this world. We need more females in office, and we need to call out the double standards and misogyny male candidates don’t have to put up with.

Leave a Comment